Bug 1970975: upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS #26252

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-06-19T19:54:11Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #26230

/assign vrutkovs

Some upgrades finish slightly above 90m limit: * https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=sig-cluster-lifecycle.*cluster+upgrade+should+complete+in+&maxAge=96h0m0s&context=3&type=junit&name=aws&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job All taking up to 105m.

vrutkovs · 2021-06-21T07:29:56Z

/retitle Bug 1970975: upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS

openshift-ci · 2021-06-21T07:30:08Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1970975, which is invalid:

expected Bugzilla bug 1970975 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1970975: upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

vrutkovs · 2021-06-21T07:32:38Z

/bugzilla refresh
/retest

openshift-ci · 2021-06-21T07:33:47Z

@vrutkovs: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1970975, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1974237 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
dependent Bugzilla bug 1974237 targets the "4.9.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh
/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

wking · 2021-06-24T17:50:20Z

/retest

smarterclayton · 2021-06-24T18:10:36Z

/approve

stbenjam · 2021-06-29T13:19:40Z

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2021-06-29T13:19:55Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, smarterclayton, stbenjam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~test/OWNERS~~ [smarterclayton]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

smarterclayton · 2021-06-29T13:48:31Z

/retest

openshift-bot · 2021-06-29T16:29:35Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

smarterclayton · 2021-06-29T17:16:02Z

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Looks like a dual stack test bug

: [sig-network] [Feature:IPv6DualStack] [LinuxOnly] Granular Checks: Services Secondary IP Family should function for client IP based session affinity: udp [LinuxOnly] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s] expand_less	50s
fail [github.com/onsi/[email protected]+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:113]: Jun 29 16:18:45.603: Unexpected endpoints return: map[netserver-0:{} netserver-1:{}], expect 1 endpoints

openshift-ci · 2021-06-29T17:16:07Z

@smarterclayton: Overrode contexts on behalf of smarterclayton: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Looks like a dual stack test bug

: [sig-network] [Feature:IPv6DualStack] [LinuxOnly] Granular Checks: Services Secondary IP Family should function for client IP based session affinity: udp [LinuxOnly] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s] expand_less 50s

fail [github.com/onsi/[email protected]+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:113]: Jun 29 16:18:45.603: Unexpected endpoints return: map[netserver-0:{} netserver-1:{}], expect 1 endpoints

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-06-29T23:36:33Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-06-30T06:15:33Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-06-30T07:15:34Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-08T18:39:44Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-08T20:10:43Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-08T22:07:43Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-08T23:31:42Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-09T00:43:42Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-09T02:07:44Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-09T02:19:44Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-09T04:32:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-09T04:43:42Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-09T07:07:42Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

vrutkovs · 2021-07-09T07:16:39Z

/hold

Still no luck with aws-proxy

vrutkovs · 2021-07-12T07:09:30Z

/retest

vrutkovs · 2021-07-12T18:22:04Z

/retest

vrutkovs · 2021-07-12T20:50:04Z

/test e2e-aws-proxy

vrutkovs · 2021-07-13T06:30:00Z

/retest
/hold cancel

vrutkovs · 2021-07-13T07:09:44Z

/test e2e-aws-proxy

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T07:19:10Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T07:32:03Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T07:45:03Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T09:37:31Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T10:13:34Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T10:25:30Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T10:49:31Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci · 2021-07-13T10:59:42Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive	`ae19206`	link	`/test e2e-gcp-disruptive`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T11:37:34Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-07-13T11:49:30Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci · 2021-07-13T13:40:52Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1970975 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1970975: upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci bot assigned vrutkovs Jun 19, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2021

upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS #26230

Merged

openshift-ci bot requested review from mrogers950 and smarterclayton June 19, 2021 19:54

openshift-ci bot changed the title ~~[release-4.8] upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS~~ Bug 1970975: upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS Jun 21, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 21, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 21, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested a review from wangke19 June 21, 2021 07:33

smarterclayton added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Jun 24, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 24, 2021

openshift-ci bot assigned stbenjam Jun 29, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 29, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 9, 2021

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 13, 2021

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0d958c3 into openshift:release-4.8 Jul 13, 2021

Bug 1970975: upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS #26252

Bug 1970975: upgrade: extend upgrade duration to 105mins on AWS #26252

Uh oh!

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jun 19, 2021

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Jun 21, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2021

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Jun 21, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2021

Uh oh!

wking commented Jun 24, 2021

Uh oh!

smarterclayton commented Jun 24, 2021

Uh oh!

stbenjam commented Jun 29, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 29, 2021

Uh oh!

smarterclayton commented Jun 29, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jun 29, 2021

Uh oh!

smarterclayton commented Jun 29, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 29, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jun 29, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jun 30, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 9, 2021

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Jul 9, 2021

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Jul 12, 2021

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Jul 12, 2021

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Jul 12, 2021

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

vrutkovs commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 13, 2021 •

edited

Loading